EPU XC
- Brand ForestMiner
- Hashrate 4.25Gh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 780 j/Gh
- Release date January 2023
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 4.25Gh
≈ 170.59 ₽
- Power 3315 W
X16-QE
- Brand Jasminer
- Hashrate 1850-1650 Mh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 0.33 j/Mh
- Release date September 2024
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 1850Mh
≈ 74.25 ₽
- Power 610.5 W
- Ads count 2
- The best price 779 USDT
Conclusion
The choice between ForestMiner EPU XC and Jasminer X16-QE is a classic dilemma for mining investors. The unified algorithm (Etchash) allows switching between coins (Ethereum Classic) on both ASICs, but maximum profit is currently achieved when mining Ethereum Classic. The EPU XC device has a single available configuration — 4.25Gh The X16-QE device from Jasminer is available in a wide range of powers. Versions from 1850Mh to 1650Mh are available. The difference in 2600 Mh shows the advantage of one model, but it's also worth paying attention to the efficiency of the models. Model EPU XC has an efficiency of 780 j/Gh and X16-QE has 0.33 j/Mh. The power consumption of ForestMiner EPU XC 4.25Gh is 3315 Watts. Jasminer X16-QE 1650Mh, in turn, consumes 544.5 Watts. The cooling type for both models is identical — classic fan airflow. Offers for ForestMiner EPU XC are temporarily unavailable, but our catalog contains many other profitable models. 2 ads found for Jasminer X16-QE. The current cost for 1850Mh power is from 779 USDT. Both new and used devices are available.
