EPU XC
- Brand ForestMiner
- Hashrate 4.25Gh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 780 j/Gh
- Release date January 2023
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 4.25Gh
≈ 171.27 ₽
- Power 3315 W
X16-Q
- Brand Jasminer
- Hashrate 1.95Gh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 317.9 j/Gh
- Release date May 2023
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 1.95Gh
≈ 78.58 ₽
- Power 619.905 W
- Ads count 4
- The best price 245 USDT
Conclusion
The choice between ForestMiner EPU XC and Jasminer X16-Q is a classic dilemma for mining investors. The unified algorithm (Etchash) allows switching between coins (Ethereum Classic) on both ASICs, but maximum profit is currently achieved when mining Ethereum Classic. The EPU XC device has a single available configuration — 4.25Gh Jasminer X16-Q is released in a single version with 1.95Gh. The difference in 2300 Mh shows the advantage of one model, but it's also worth paying attention to the efficiency of the models. Model EPU XC has an efficiency of 780 j/Gh and X16-Q has 317.9 j/Gh. The power consumption of ForestMiner EPU XC 4.25Gh is 3315 Watts. Jasminer X16-Q 1.95Gh, in turn, consumes 619.905 Watts. The cooling type for both models is identical — classic fan airflow. Offers for ForestMiner EPU XC are temporarily unavailable, but our catalog contains many other profitable models. Our platform has 4 offers of Jasminer X16-Q from different companies, available both in stock and on order. The best price for the 1.95Gh version is currently 245 USDT.
