EPU XC
- Brand ForestMiner
- Hashrate 4.25Gh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 780 j/Gh
- Release date January 2023
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 4.25Gh
≈ 205.30 ₽
- Power 3315 W
X16-P
- Brand Jasminer
- Hashrate 5.8Gh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 327.6 j/Gh
- Release date August 2023
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 5.8Gh
≈ 280.17 ₽
- Power 1900.08 W
- Ads count 1
- The best price 2940 USDT
Conclusion
Today in the battle we have EPU XC from ForestMiner against competitor Jasminer's X16-P. Both devices operate on Etchash, mining Ethereum Classic. The main profit focus is currently on Ethereum Classic. The EPU XC device has a single available configuration — 4.25Gh The X16-P device has a single available configuration — 5.8Gh The difference in computing power is 26.72%, but the final advantage can only be shown by the energy efficiency of the equipment. Model EPU XC has 780 j/Gh, while X16-P has 327.6 j/Gh. Model EPU XC 4.25Gh has a power consumption of 3315 Watts, while X16-P 5.8Gh consumes 1900.08 Watts. Both miners use air cooling, which requires good room ventilation. Offers for ForestMiner EPU XC are temporarily unavailable, but our catalog contains many other profitable models. 1 active listings available for Jasminer X16-P. The best price-to-performance ratio: 5.8Gh for 2940 USDT.
