EPU XC
- Brand ForestMiner
- Hashrate 4.25Gh
- Algorithm Etchash
- Efficiency 780 j/Gh
- Release date January 2023
- Cooling Air
Calculation for 4.25Gh
≈ 170.20 ₽
- Power 3315 W
WhatsMiner M53
- Brand MicroBT
- Hashrate 226-250 Th
- Algorithm SHA-256
- Efficiency 29 j/Th
- Release date May 2023
- Cooling Hydro
Calculation for 250Th
≈ 814.06 ₽
- Power 7250 W
Conclusion
Today in the battle we have EPU XC from ForestMiner against competitor MicroBT's WhatsMiner M53. Different algorithms (Etchash vs SHA-256) mean different strategies: EPU XC mines Ethereum Classic, while WhatsMiner M53 is focused on Bitcoin, Fractal Bitcoin. The EPU XC device has a single available configuration — 4.25Gh Choose the right WhatsMiner M53 version for your needs from 13 options with power ranging from 226Th to 250Th inclusive. Model EPU XC 4.25Gh has a power consumption of 3315 Watts, while WhatsMiner M53 250Th consumes 7250 Watts. There is a fundamental difference in cooling type: EPU XC uses Air, while WhatsMiner M53 operates on Hydro. Offers for ForestMiner EPU XC are temporarily unavailable, but our catalog contains many other profitable models. 1 active listings available for MicroBT WhatsMiner M53. The best price-to-performance ratio: 228Th for \"Price on request\".
